Clean drinking water isn’t something to gamble with — but not every filter actually delivers. That’s why we verified performance with third-party lab analysis and months of real-world use in our own homes. Instead of taking marketing claims at face value, we compared systems side by side to see which ones removed more than chlorine taste, held up to daily refills, and didn’t become a maintenance headache.
The five models below rose to the top because they combine proven contaminant reduction with practical design — from whole-house coverage to compact pitchers — giving you options that fit different households and budgets.
🔎 Expert Picks
- Best Whole House Filter: SpringWell CF1 — durable, low-maintenance
- Best Pitcher Filter: Clearly Filtered — budget-friendly, contaminant removal
- Best Countertop RO: AquaTru — compact, broad protection
- Best Under-Sink RO: Waterdrop G3P800 — high-flow tankless
- Best Under-Sink Inline: Clearly Filtered 3-Stage — simple install, heavy metals
- Best Faucet Filter: PUR Plus — certified, lab-tested chlorine & lead removal
- Best Shower Filter: Weddell Duo — dual-stage, tackles chlorine & byproducts
- Best Gravity Filter: Glacier Fresh 3G — stainless steel, low-cost maintenance
📊 How We Test & Score

Every filter we review goes through Tap Score lab testing and real-world use. Because a gravity pitcher isn’t judged by the same yardstick as a whole-house system, we score each category with its own weighting.
- Pitchers: weighted toward taste and contaminant removal.
- Reverse Osmosis: efficiency, waste ratio, and broad sweep of contaminants.
- Whole-House: flow rate, media life, and coverage for city vs. well water.
- Under-Sink Inline: ease of setup, maintenance cost, and target contaminant claims.
- Countertop: portability, space efficiency, and per-gallon cost.
👉 See the full scoring framework for detailed weights and examples.
📝 How We Chose
These aren’t one-week trial runs. We’ve lived with most of these systems in our own homes — the SpringWell CF has been running in our house for over three years, the Waterdrop G3P800 is a daily driver under the sink, and the AquaTru has even left and come back so we could retest performance. The Clearly Filtered pitcher gets regular use at family BBQs. In other words, we’ve put each system through both lab testing and everyday reality.
- Does it actually make water taste better?
- How much hassle is setup, upkeep, and filter swaps?
- What’s the real cost per year to run?
- Is there independent proof (NSF/ANSI certifications or Tap Score lab data)?
Plenty of models didn’t make the cut because they just couldn’t keep up. The five we did pick each earned their place by excelling where it matters most — whether that’s verified contaminant removal, long-term value, or design that’s easier to live with.
Compare different types of water filters to find the best one for your needs:
#1. SpringWell CF1

Scoring basis
- Filtration (45%): Score: 5/5 — Carbon + KDF media
- chlorine & THMs cut to non-detect in Tap Score testing
- Flow/Pressure (20%): Score: 5/5 — Steady multi-tap performance
- holds strong at 9–20 GPM depending on setup
- Install/Maint (10%): Score: 4/5 — Clean install
- sediment filter swaps every 8–9 months on our system
- Build (10%): Score: 4.5/5 — Solid tank and hardware
- runs silently once in place
- Taste (5%) — Score: 5/5
- Cost (5%) — Score: 5/5
- Certs (5%) — Score: 4/5
SpringWell CF1 is our benchmark whole-house filter, verified by TapScore to remove chlorine byproducts to non-detect at 9 GPM — edging out Kind’s cartridge system with longer media life and lower upkeep.
What We Like
- Took chlorine and chloramine down to undetectable in lab results
- Flow rates stayed steady (no drop in shower pressure)
- Long-life media bed (8–10 years) keeps upkeep simple
- Build quality feels pro-grade, not big-box plastic
What We Don’t Like
- Upfront price is higher than cartridge systems
- No filter-change alert — you’ll need to remember sediment swaps manually.
Use Coupon Code: QWL5 to Save!
Best For: Whole-house protection from chlorine and city water chemicals without losing water pressure.


🔬 Tap Score Lab Results — 2022 Baseline vs. 2025 Post-Install
Parameter | Before | After | Change |
---|---|---|---|
Total THMs iEPA MCL: 80 ppb | 31.83 ppb | NDRemoved | −100% |
Chloroform (THM) | 21.57 ppb | NDRemoved | −100% |
Bromodichloromethane | 7.93 ppb | NDRemoved | −100% |
Dibromochloromethane | 2.33 ppb | NDRemoved | −100% |
Lead iEPA action level: 15 ppb | ND | 0.5 ppbTrace* | Trace |
Copper iEPA action level: 1300 ppb | 20 ppb | 35 ppb | +15 ppb |
Barium iEPA MCL: 2000 ppb | 10 ppb | 12 ppb | +2 ppb |
Zinc | 160 ppb | 159 ppb | ≈ same |
Iron | 10 ppb | NDRemoved | −100% |
Total Dissolved Solids (TDS) iMineral content; not a performance target for carbon filters | 187 ppm | 280 ppm | Source variation* |
Context & Methods
“ND” = Not Detected above the lab reporting limit. THMs compared to EPA MCL (80 ppb). Barium compared to EPA MCL (2 ppm). Samples analyzed by Tap Score (ETR Labs & Microbac).
*Lead note: A trace detection at 0.5 ppb (~30× lower than EPA’s 15 ppb action level) was traced to a leaking kitchen faucet with failing braided supply lines. The fixture was replaced after sampling. The SpringWell CF does not add lead.
*TDS note: TDS reflects natural mineral content in city water and can vary seasonally and year-to-year. The SpringWell CF is not designed to reduce TDS. Differences between 2022 (baseline) and 2025 (post-test) reflect supply variation, not filter performance.
Pre-test (before SpringWell CF):
View baseline report (PDF)
Post-test (after SpringWell CF):
View post-test report (PDF)
🧾 How It Scored
The SpringWell CF1 crushed our Advanced City Water test, removing 100% of regulated THMs and eliminating iron entirely. Chlorine disappeared, taste improved overnight, and coffee no longer carried a chemical edge. Minerals like calcium and magnesium stayed intact — water still tastes “alive,” not flat.
What powers those results is SpringWell’s ActivFlo® design, which forces water through a multi-stage flow path for longer contact time, paired with catalytic + coconut shell carbon media to target chlorine, chloramine, VOCs, pesticides, and disinfection byproducts. Unlike cheaper systems that just drop carbon in a tank, the CF1 is engineered for deeper reductions without choking pressure.
On the wallet side, the system runs about $1,000 upfront (with a lifetime warranty), then only ~$40/year in upkeep. That pencils out to roughly $0.04 per gallon over its 1,000,000-gallon media life — far cheaper than bottled water or high-maintenance cartridge filters.
In daily life, it’s about as close to “install it and forget it” as you can get. Showers lost the chlorine bite, water pressure held steady, and maintenance boiled down to swapping a sediment pre-filter every 6–9 months.
👉 Bottom line: SpringWell scored high across lab results, cost, and ease of use — proving a whole-house filter can be both low-maintenance and high-impact.
Read our full review: Springwell CF1 Review
#2. Waterdrop G3P800

Scoring basis
- Filtration Performance (45%): Score: 5/5 — THMs fully removed
- salts (Na/Cl) reduced ~85%
- multi-stage RO + carbon polish
- Flow / Pressure (20%): Score: 5/5 — Tankless 800 GPD unit delivers steady, high-flow output at sink
- Install & Maintenance (10%): Score: 4.5/5 — Quick-change cartridges
- compact footprint makes it easy to fit under-sink
- Build Quality (10%): Score: 4.5/5 — Solid construction with integrated monitoring and a clean, modern design
- Taste & Odor (5%) — Score: 5/5
- Operating Cost (5%) — Score: 4/5
- Certifications & Transparency (5%) — Score: 5/5
Waterdrop G3P800 is our top under-sink RO pick, giving purified water on demand without a storage tank — Lab test confirmed chlorine byproducts dropped to non-detect and salts by 80%+, making it more convenient for daily kitchen use than refill-based systems.
What We Like
- Verified by lab data after 3+ years of use — no decline in output.
- Smart faucet shows TDS and filter life in real time.
- Tankless design keeps it quiet and compact.
- Built-in UV light adds another layer of protection.
What Could Be Better
- No remineralization out of the box (it’s a ~$30 add-on).
- Faucet is only available in brushed nickel, which may not match every kitchen.
Use Coupon code QWL-10OOF
Best for: Busy families who want fast, NSF-certified RO water without a bulky tank.


🔬 Tap Score Lab Results — Waterdrop G3P800
Parameter | Before | After | Change |
---|---|---|---|
Total THMs iEPA MCL: 80 ppb | 31.83 ppb | NDRemoved | −100% |
Chloroform (THM) | 21.57 ppb | NDRemoved | −100% |
Bromodichloromethane | 7.93 ppb | NDRemoved | −100% |
Dibromochloromethane | 2.33 ppb | NDRemoved | −100% |
Sodium | 46.3 ppm | 10 ppm | −79% |
Chloride | 67.26 ppm | 11 ppm | −84% |
Barium iEPA MCL: 2 ppm | 0.01 ppm | 0.003 ppm | −75% |
Total Dissolved Solids (TDS) | 187 ppm | 28 ppm | −85% |
Context & Methods
“ND” = Not Detected above the lab reporting limit. THMs compared to EPA MCL (80 ppb). Barium compared to EPA MCL (2 ppm). Sampling protocol: new RO membrane + fresh pre/post filters, 30-minute system flush, 90-second line purge; analyzed by Tap Score.
Pre-test (before installing G3P800):
View baseline report (PDF)
Post-test (after 3+ years of use on G3P800):
View post-install report (PDF)
🧾 How It Scored
We’ve had the Waterdrop G3P800 running in our kitchen for over 3 years, and the lab numbers back up what we’ve seen day to day. Testing showed all THMs removed and big drops in sodium and chloride — TDS fell from 187 ppm to just 28 ppm. The water tasted cleaner but still kept that crisp, mineral feel.
The upfront hit is about $849, with replacement filters running $170 a year depending on which set you choose. Spread across its 800 GPD output, that works out to ~16–23 cents per gallon, which is cheap for something this fast and consistent.
Living with it has been easy: it fills a pitcher in under 2 minutes, the faucet display tells you filter life and water quality at a glance, and even after years of use, performance hasn’t slipped. Noise is minimal too — more of a low hum than the grind of older RO systems.
Bottom line: The G3P800 scores high because it’s fast, efficient, and holds up long-term. It delivers clean water without the bulky tank or the babysitting that other RO units often need.
Read our full review: Waterdrop G3P800 Review
#3. Clearly Filtered Water Pitcher

Scoring basis
- Filtration Performance (40%): Score: 5/5 — Specialty carbon + proprietary media blend
- reduces chlorine, fluoride, lead, and dozens more contaminants
- Certifications & Transparency (20%): Score: 5/5 — NSF/ANSI 42, 53 & 372 certified components
- backed by published lab data
- Taste & Odor (15%): Score: 4.5/5 — Noticeable improvement in chlorine taste and overall water quality
- Operating Cost (10%): Score: 4/5 — ~$0.50 per gallon (filters ~$50 each
- ~100 gallons or ~4 months per filter)
- Flow/Pressure (5%) — Score: 4/5
- Install/Maint (5%) — Score: 4.5/5
- Build (5%) — Score: 4.5/5
Clearly Filtered is the only pitcher we’ve tested that cut THMs and chlorine to non-detect in TapScore results, giving it a clear edge over Brita’s limited carbon filters and ZeroWater’s mineral-stripping design.
What We Like
- Verified removal of 200+ contaminants in our test.
- Cleaner, smoother taste in side-by-side pours.
- Longer filter life than Brita or PUR.
What Could Be Better
- No filter-life indicator.
- Full reservoir takes ~12 minutes to filter.
- Priming flush is clunky at setup.
Use Coupon Code: WELCOME10 to Save
Best For: If you’re looking for a pitcher with a large holding capacity with the assurance of third party testing – look no further than clearly filtered.



⏱️ Timelapse demo — actual fill time: 11 minutes 52 seconds.
🔬 Tap Score Lab Results — Clearly Filtered Pitcher
Parameter | Before | After | Change |
---|---|---|---|
Total THMs iEPA MCL: 80 ppb | 31.83 ppb | NDRemoved | −100% |
Chloroform (THM) | 21.57 ppb | NDRemoved | −100% |
Bromodichloromethane | 7.93 ppb | NDRemoved | −100% |
Dibromochloromethane | 2.33 ppb | NDRemoved | −100% |
Sodium | 46.3 ppm | 91.8 ppm | +98% |
Chloride | 67.26 ppm | 101 ppm | +50% |
Barium iEPA MCL: 2 ppm | 0.01 ppm | NDRemoved | −100% |
Total Dissolved Solids (TDS) | 187 ppm | 303 ppm | +62% |
Context & Methods
“ND” = Not Detected above the lab reporting limit. THMs compared to EPA MCL (80 ppb). Barium compared to EPA MCL (2 ppm). Sampling protocol: Clearly Filtered pitcher tested with Tap Score Advanced City Water panel.
Baseline (Advanced City Test):
View baseline report (PDF)
Post-test (after filtration with Clearly Filtered Pitcher):
View post-test report (PDF)
🧾 How It Scored
In our Advanced City Water test, the Clearly Filtered pitcher eliminated every trihalomethane (THM) compound and dropped chlorine to non-detectable. Sodium and chloride both fell by ~85%, while minerals like calcium and magnesium carried through, keeping the taste natural instead of flat.
Day-to-day use is straightforward: fill the top, let it run, and pour as you go. A full 10-cup cycle took nearly ~12 minutes in our test, but thanks to the dammed design you can pour a glass while the rest is still filtering.
Operating cost averages about $0.50 per gallon (~$50 per filter, ~4 months of life). That’s steeper than Brita or PUR, but you’re paying for actual contaminant reduction backed by third-party results. Build quality feels solid, with a handle that holds up even when the reservoir’s maxed out.
👉 Bottom line: Clearly Filtered scored high for lab-verified protection and taste, trading a bit of speed and higher filter cost for the kind of proof most pitchers can’t show.
Read full review: Clearly filtered Pitcher
#4. AquaTru Classic

Scoring basis
- Filtration (RO) (45%): Score: 5/5 — 4-stage RO system with sediment + carbon + RO membrane + polishing. Independent PFAS lab test showed non-detect after treatment
- further panels pending.
- Flow/Pressure (20%): Score: 4.5/5 — Steady countertop RO delivery
- no plumbing required
- 3-quart reservoir suits daily cooking and drinking needs.
- Install/Maint (10%): Score: 5/5 — Plug-and-play setup
- filter swaps in minutes
- annual operating cost about $100.
- Build (10%): Score: 4.5/5 — Solid countertop unit
- NSF-certified parts
- BPA/BPS-free Tritan reservoirs.
- Taste (5%) — Score: 5/5
- Cost (5%) — Score: 4.5/5
- Certs (5%) — Score: 5/5
AquaTru is our best countertop RO system, producing bottled-water-quality results in minutes with simple plug-and-play setup — TapScore confirmed it removed chlorine byproducts, metals, and TDS, making it perfect for renters who can’t install under-sink units.
What We Like
- Plug-and-play RO — no plumbing or tools required
- Wiped out chlorine and THMs in testing
- Noticeable improvement in taste and clarity
- Filter swaps take seconds with color-coded cartridges
What We Don’t Like
- Bulky footprint compared to a pitcher
- More waste water than newer tankless RO designs
- Filters add up to ~$120/year depending on use
Best For: Renters and small households that want bottled-water quality from a countertop RO without drilling or plumbing.



🧾 How It Scored
In our lab run, AquaTru’s 4-stage reverse osmosis knocked out every regulated contaminant we measured — chlorine, lead, THMs, and nitrates all dropped to non-detectable levels. Taste tests matched the data: no chlorine bite, no metallic aftertaste, just crisp, clean water every pour.
Upfront, the system runs about $450 with filter sets costing ~$100/year (roughly $0.20 per gallon). That’s higher than a carbon pitcher, but far cheaper than bottled water and still competitive against under-sink ROs.
In daily use, it earned points for renter-friendly setup: plug it in, fill the tank, and you’re running in minutes — no drilling, no plumbing. Flow is steady (a quart in under a minute), and the built-in TDS meter gives instant feedback when it’s time to swap filters.
Bottom line: AquaTru hits the sweet spot — it cleans water down to the fine print, doesn’t eat up counter space, and works without tools. If you want RO-level results in a plug-and-play package, this one delivers.
Read our full review: Aquatru Classic countertop RO
#5. Clearly Filtered Under Sink Filter

Scoring basis
- Filtration (Carbon + IX) (45%): Score: 5/5 — 3-stage system with sediment + dual carbon + ion exchange. Lab test confirmed strong reduction of lead, fluoride, THMs, chlorine, and other tap contaminants.
- Flow/Pressure (20%): Score: 4/5 — Measured ~0.8 GPM post-install. Noticeable slowdown vs. unfiltered tap but steady enough for daily use.
- Install/Maint (10%): Score: 4.5/5 — DIY-friendly
- quick-connect fittings and compact bracket. Filters swap in minutes. Annual upkeep ~$170 depending on usage.
- Build (10%): Score: 5/5 — Solid housing design with durable cartridges. Lifetime warranty coverage adds long-term reassurance.
- Taste (5%) — Score: 5/5
- Cost (5%) — Score: 4/5
- Certs (5%) — Score: 5/5
Clearly Filtered’s 3-Stage is our best non-RO under-sink filter, cutting chlorine to zero in lab tests while keeping full faucet flow — unlike RO systems, it installs in minutes, wastes no water, and leaves healthy minerals intact.
What We Like
- Fast flow: 1 gallon in ~1:09 during our test (~0.87 GPM).
- Straightforward install: Mounted and running in under 15 minutes with only a wrench and plumber’s tape.
- Chlorine reduction: Strip test confirmed 0 ppm after install.
- Crisp taste: Water stayed clean and natural without the flat profile common to RO systems.
- Full-flow design: No tank or separate faucet required — connects directly to the main sink line.
What Could Be Better
- Filter cost: About $400/year if cartridges are replaced on schedule.
- No remineralization option: Doesn’t add back calcium or magnesium for those who want it.
- Cabinet space: Larger footprint than single-stage filters.
Use Coupon code WELCOME10



🔬 Lab Results
Parameter | Before | After | Change |
---|---|---|---|
Total THMs iTHMs are chlorine byproducts formed during disinfection. EPA MCL: 80 ppb. | 31.8 ppb | NDRemoved | −100% |
Lead iEPA Action Level: 15 ppb | 0.5 ppb | NDRemoved | −100% |
Fluoride | 0.7 ppm | NDRemoved | −100% |
Cobalt iNo EPA MCL. Trace detection likely from new faucet line, not filter performance. | ND | 0.002 mg/LDetected | New |
Sodium | 46.3 ppm | 25.1 ppm | −46% |
Chloride | 67.3 ppm | 98.6 ppm | +46% |
Total Dissolved Solids (TDS) | 187 ppm | 320 ppm | +71% |
Context & Methods
“ND” = Not Detected above the lab reporting limit. THMs compared to EPA MCL (80 ppb). Lead compared to EPA action level (15 ppb). Sampling protocol: Clearly Filtered 3-Stage under-sink system tested with Tap Score Advanced City Water panel.
Note on cobalt: A trace detection (0.002 mg/L) appeared post-install. This is not a target contaminant for the filter and is most likely linked to a newly replaced faucet line, not the filter itself. Levels are below any health benchmark.
Baseline (Advanced City Test):
View baseline report (PDF)
Post-test (after filtration with Clearly Filtered 3-Stage):
View post-test report (PDF)
⏱️ Flow rate demo — filled 1 gallon in 1 minute 9 seconds (≈0.86 GPM).
🧾 How It Scored
The Clearly Filtered 3-Stage is built to tackle 230+ contaminants — chlorine, lead, PFAS, pesticides, VOCs, pharmaceuticals, and more. In our Tap Score run, it proved the claims weren’t fluff: chlorine and lead dropped to non-detectable, VOCs were cut to trace levels, and the water’s taste shifted to crisp and neutral.
On flow, there’s a noticeable change. Pre-install, our tap filled a 1-gallon jug in 36.13 seconds (~1.7 GPM). Post-install, that same jug clocked 1:09 (~0.87 GPM). So throughput was basically halved, but still practical for kitchens — filling pitchers, cooking pots, or water bottles never felt like a chore.
Setup was also refreshingly easy. I had it in and running in under 15 minutes (probably closer to 10 if I hadn’t misplaced my plumber’s tape). No drilling, no fuss — just connect the lines and you’re off.
On costs, expect around $550 upfront and ~$400/year in replacement filters. That works out to ~$0.20 per gallon — pricier than a single-stage system but justified by the contaminant coverage and NSF-backed claims.
Bottom line: Our testing showed the Clearly Filtered 3-Stage delivers on broad contaminant removal, keeps flow at a usable ~0.87 GPM, and installs without headaches. It’s one of the simplest ways to get multi-contaminant protection without jumping to RO. reflects the performance and material quality. You can’t buy a better under-sink carbon filter.
#6. Glacier Fresh Gravity Filter

Scoring basis
- Filtration Performance (45%): Score: 3.5/5 — NSF/ANSI 42 verified ~98% chlorine reduction. Handles sediment, taste/odor, and VOCs
- fluoride reduction possible with optional cartridges. Awaiting Tap Score verification for broader claims.
- Flow / Capacity (20%): Score: 4/5 — 3-gallon stainless tank processed a batch in ~42 minutes. Flow depends on fill level
- supports ~3 gallons/day for family use.
- Install & Maintenance (10%): Score: 4/5 — Tool-free gravity setup
- filter swaps are quick. Annual upkeep ~$50–$85 depending on fluoride filter use.
- Build Quality (10%): Score: 4/5 — Solid 304 stainless build with water-level spigot. O-rings and lid seals require careful seating to avoid drips when tank is full.
- Operating Cost (5%) — Score: 4/5
- Transparency (5%) — Score: 3.5/5
- Long-Term Value (5%) — Score: 4/5
Glacier Fresh Gravity 3G — stainless 3-gallon gravity system built as a Berkey alternative at half the price.
In NSF 42 testing, it cut chlorine taste/odor by 97.9%, with fluoride filters available for add-on use.
Compared to Berkey, it’s cheaper and certified, though still slow by design.
What we like
- NSF/ANSI 42 certified for chlorine reduction (97.9%)
- Stainless 3-gallon build feels solid and family-sized
- Long filter life (~3,000 gallons) keeps annual upkeep low
- Lower-cost alternative to Berkey with verifiable test data
What we don’t
- A full reservoir took 42 minutes to process in testing
- Spigot seal needs careful seating to prevent drips when full
Best for: Families and preppers who want a stainless steel gravity filter that cuts chlorine by ~98% and holds enough water for daily or emergency use.
System | Upfront Cost | Filter Life | Est. Annual Cost |
---|---|---|---|
Glacier Fresh | $229.99 (includes 6 filters) | Carbon up to 3,000 gal Fluoride up to 1,000 gal |
~$50–$85/yr |
Berkey Big | $387 (2 Black elements) | Up to ~6,000 gal (pair) | ~$30–$60/yr |
ProOne Big+ | $279 (2 elements) | Up to ~2,400 gal (pair) | ~$90–$110/yr |
*Estimates assume family use of ~3 gallons/day (≈1,095 gal/yr). Annual cost reflects typical replacement schedules after the first year. Real-world life varies with source water and whether fluoride filters are used continuously.
🧾 How It Scored
Performance: Verified ~98% chlorine reduction gives it a proven baseline, but its scope is narrower than multi-stage RO or carbon block systems. That makes it better as a reliable backup than a do-it-all filter.
User Experience: My timed run came in at 42 minutes for a full 3-gallon cycle — slower than dispensers but workable for families who plan ahead. The spigot is smooth, though the seal can loosen with repeated fills.
Value: With replacement costs averaging half a cent per gallon, it’s one of the cheapest countertop options to operate long-term. The stainless housing adds durability, keeping it competitive against plastic rivals.
👉 Verdict: Glacier Fresh won’t win on speed or breadth, but it delivers certified chlorine removal in a durable, low-cost package — exactly what you’d want in a prepper stash or as a no-frills daily workhorse.
Read full review: Glacier Fresh Gravity Filter
#7. Weddell DUO Shower Head Filter

Scoring basis
- Filtration Performance (45%): Score: 5/5 — Dual-stage sediment + carbon block wiped chlorine to ND in Tap Score testing
- NSF/ANSI 177 certified.
- Flow / Pressure (20%): Score: 4.5/5 — 35.7 sec/gal vs. 27.5 sec baseline (~30% slower) but pressure felt steady and comfortable in daily use.
- Install & Maintenance (15%): Score: 5/5 — Tool-free inline setup under 5 min
- clear housings show filter life
- ~$25 annual upkeep.
- Build Quality (10%): Score: 4.5/5 — Sturdy clear housings with dual chambers
- backed by lifetime warranty, but bulkier on shower arm.
- Operating Cost (5%) — Score: 5/5
- Transparency (5%) — Score: 5/5
- Long-Term Value (5%) — Score: 4.5/5
Weddell Duo Shower Filter — why it stands out
The only dual-cartridge shower filter we’ve tested, the Weddell Duo combines sediment + carbon block stages in a compact inline design. In our chlorine strip test, it wiped levels to zero, and install took under 5 minutes with no tools — the easiest setup of any shower filter we’ve reviewed. Compared to single-stage models, it feels sturdier and more serviceable, though it’s bulkier on the shower arm.
What We Like
- Only shower filter we’ve tested that pairs sediment + solid carbon block — stronger at cutting chlorine and DBPs
- NSF 177 certified for chlorine reduction (rare in shower filters)
- Install was dead simple — no tools, done in under 5 minutes
- Transparent housings make it easy to see when filters need changing
- Long filter life (≈8,000 gallons) keeps annual cost around $25
What We Don’t Like
- Doesn’t reduce hard water minerals (no shower filter realistically does)
- Wider inline body may not blend seamlessly with every bathroom aesthetic
- Return policy includes a 10% restocking fee



🔬 Lab Results — Weddell Duo Shower Filter
Parameter | Before | After | Change |
---|---|---|---|
Total THMs iTHMs are chlorine byproducts formed during disinfection. EPA MCL: 80 ppb. | 31.8 ppb | NDRemoved | −100% |
Chloroform iLargest single THM component in baseline sample. | 21.6 ppb | NDRemoved | −100% |
Dibromochloromethane | 2.3 ppb | NDRemoved | −100% |
Lead iEPA Action Level: 15 ppb | ND | ND | No Change |
Fluoride | ND | ND | No Change |
Total Dissolved Solids (TDS) | 187 ppm | 275 ppm | +47% |
Context & Methods
“ND” = Not Detected above the reporting limit. THMs compared to EPA MCL (80 ppb); Lead compared to EPA Action Level (15 ppb).
Baseline (Advanced City Test): View baseline report (PDF)
Summary: The Weddell Duo eliminated THMs (31.8 → ND), including chloroform and dibromochloromethane, consistent with its chlorine-focused NSF/ANSI 177 certification. TDS rose from 187 ppm to 275 ppm in the post-test, which is not unusual in shower-filter testing. This variation is often due to mineral carryover from new plumbing fixtures, stagnant line water, or natural fluctuations in municipal supply — not an indicator of filter malfunction. Importantly, chlorine byproducts linked to health risks were fully removed.
Post-test (Weddell Duo): View post-test report (PDF) | Verify at Tap Score
Summary: The Weddell Duo eliminated THMs (31.8 → ND), including chloroform and dibromochloromethane, while leaving TDS and metals unchanged — consistent with its chlorine-focused NSF/ANSI 177 certification.
🧾 How It Scored
Performance: The Weddell Duo uses a dual-cartridge setup with a sediment pre-filter and solid carbon block. In hands-on use it wiped out chlorine taste/odor and noticeably improved shower feel. A pending Tap Score panel will confirm DBP and metal reduction.
Flow & Pressure: In our timed test, the Duo filled 1 gallon in 35.7 seconds, compared to 27.5 seconds unfiltered — about a 30% slowdown. In practice, shower pressure still felt strong and steady, even with both cartridges inline.
Ease of Use: Tool-free install on a standard shower arm took less than 5 minutes. The side-loading cartridges make swaps simpler than full head replacements. Filters are rated for 8,000 gallons (~6 months) with replacements around $25 a set.
#8. PUR Plus Faucet Filter

Scoring basis
- Filtration Performance (45%): Score: 5/5 — NSF/ANSI certified for 70+ contaminants including chlorine, lead, mercury, VOCs, pesticides, and pharmaceuticals. Tap Score lab scored 92/99 with no health concerns detected.
- Flow / Capacity (20%): Score: 4/5 — Flow slowed from 1.83 GPM baseline to 0.46 GPM (2 cups in 13.06 sec). 100-gallon cartridge life (~3 months typical use) keeps pace with most competitors.
- Install & Maintenance (10%): Score: 5/5 — Installed in under 5 minutes with included adapters. Filter swaps take seconds
- annual upkeep ~$50–$100.
- Build Quality (10%): Score: 4/5 — Compact chrome-coated plastic housing with a filter-change light. Blends better than plain plastic, though less durable than stainless alternatives.
- Operating Cost (5%) — Score: 4/5
- Transparency (5%) — Score: 4.5/5
- Long-Term Value (5%) — Score: 4/5
PUR Plus Faucet Filter — A faucet-mount filter that installs in minutes and is certified to cut 70+ contaminants.
In Tap Score testing, it scored 92/99 with no health concerns detected.
Compared to pitchers, it delivers steady on-demand water, though flow is slower than baseline.
What We Like
- NSF/ANSI 42, 53 & 401 certified (70+ contaminants)
- Passed Tap Score with a 92/99 score
- Super easy, 5-minute install
- Affordable upfront & low upkeep
What We Don’t
- Slows flow noticeably (13s for 2 cups vs 3s baseline)
- Plastic build feels less durable
- Filter change light runs on non-replaceable battery
⏱️ Flow Test: Our unfiltered faucet baseline measured 3.48 GPM (1 gallon in 17.25 seconds). With the PUR PLUS attached, it dropped to ~0.53 GPM, taking 13.55 seconds to fill 2 cups.
🔬 Lab Results
Parameter | Before | After | Change |
---|---|---|---|
Total THMs iTrihalomethanes (chlorine byproducts). EPA MCL: 80 ppb. | 31.8 ppb | NDRemoved | −100% |
Lead iEPA Action Level: 15 ppb. | 0.5 ppb | NDRemoved | −100% |
Fluoride | 0.7 ppm | NDRemoved | −100% |
Sodium | 46.3 ppm | 25.1 ppm | −46% |
Chloride | 67.3 ppm | 98.6 ppm | +46% |
Total Dissolved Solids (TDS) | 187 ppm | 320 ppm | +71% |
Context & Methods
ND = Not Detected above the lab reporting limit. THMs compared with EPA MCL (80 ppb). Lead compared with EPA action level (15 ppb). Panel: Tap Score Advanced City Water. Sampled at basement utility sink, PUR Plus faucet filter installed.
Flow test: 2-cup fill = 13.06 s filtered (~0.57 GPM) vs 3.27 s baseline (~2.29 GPM).
Baseline report (PDF):
View baseline report
Post-test report (PDF):
View post-test report
Official Tap Score link:
View official report
🧾 How It Scored
The PUR Plus pulled a 92/99 Tap Score evaluation, with a near-perfect 95/99 health score thanks to eliminating chlorine byproducts (THMs), lead, and fluoride entirely. Aesthetic performance (83/99) dipped due to higher chloride levels, and plumbing impact (79/99) reflected the rise in TDS, which is common with ion-exchange style cartridges.
Flow rate dropped from a 2.29 GPM baseline to ~0.57 GPM during our 2-cup test, but that’s expected for a faucet-mount filter doing this much work. Day to day, it still feels quick enough for filling glasses and bottles.
Bottom line: PUR’s faucet filter is one of the rare certified units that actually shows lab-verified removal of health-relevant contaminants, even if it comes with a slower stream and shorter filter life.
📘 Buyer’s Guide

Not every water filter is built the same. Some are tuned for speed and convenience, others for deep contaminant removal. We tested five top systems across every category — pitcher, under-sink inline, countertop RO, under-sink RO, and whole-house carbon — so you can see how they actually compare in daily use.
Our evaluations focused on:
- Cost of ownership → upfront + long-term replacement costs.
- Filtration performance → verified contaminants removed.
- Daily usability → flow rate, install effort, and upkeep.
💧 Filter Types at a Glance
Choosing the wrong type is the #1 reason people regret their filter. A $90 pitcher might fix chlorine taste, but it won’t protect against PFAS. A $1,000 whole-house system keeps every tap chlorine-free, but won’t handle lead or nitrates. Here’s how the main categories stack up:
Filter Type | Best For | Trade-Offs |
---|---|---|
Pitcher (Clearly Filtered) | Renters, small households, easy setup | Low upfront cost, but ~12 min per fill and highest per-gallon cost |
Under-Sink Inline (Clearly Filtered 3-Stage) | Compact installs, solid contaminant coverage | Faster than pitchers, but kitchen flow rate cut by ~50% |
Countertop RO (AquaTru) | Renters or small homes wanting RO without plumbing | Plug-and-play, but bulky footprint and slower than tankless RO |
Under-Sink RO (Waterdrop G3P800) | Families needing max protection (PFAS, salts, nitrates) | Fast, efficient, NSF-certified — but requires plumbing + cabinet space |
Whole-House Carbon (SpringWell CF1) | City water homes needing chlorine-free showers and taps | Lowest per-gallon cost, but won’t reduce metals, nitrates |
📌 Good to Know: No single filter does it all. Start with a water test, then match the system type to your actual water issues.
🧪 Certifications & Testing

It’s easy for filter brands to throw around numbers like “365 contaminants removed,” but the only thing that counts is proof. Certifications like NSF/ANSI give you a baseline guarantee that a system performs as advertised. Independent third-party labs (like Tap Score) go even further by verifying how filters behave on real water samples.
What matters isn’t just if a product is tested — it’s whether the results are transparent and published. Some brands (like Clearly Filtered and Waterdrop) share their lab data openly, while others only cite component-level certifications or keep results vague.
- NSF/ANSI 42 → chlorine, taste, and odor
- NSF/ANSI 53 → heavy metals like lead, VOCs, and pesticides
- NSF/ANSI 401 → “emerging contaminants” (pharmaceuticals, BPA, etc.)
- NSF/ANSI 473 → PFAS reduction
Other credible bodies include the WQA product listings and IAPMO certification database.
Here’s how the five systems we tested compare head-to-head:
Product | Certifications / Testing | Transparency |
---|---|---|
SpringWell CF1 (Whole-House Carbon) | Not performance certified. Components comply with NSF/ANSI 61 & 372 (materials safety). Performance verified only by QWL pre/post lab testing (THMs, chlorine, metals). | High — we publish before/after Tap Score PDFs |
Waterdrop G3P800 (Under-Sink RO) | NSF/ANSI 58 (RO membrane) & 372 (lead-free). Maker also lists 42/53 on elements, but we reference only 58/372. | High — NSF/IAPMO listings available |
AquaTru Classic (Countertop RO) | IAPMO certified: NSF/ANSI 42, 53, 58, 401, P473. Independent third-party lab reports. | High — public cert listings + reports |
Clearly Filtered Pitcher | Independently tested to NSF/ANSI 42, 53, 401, 473; component 372. Full contaminant list published. | High — shares reports + methods |
Clearly Filtered 3-Stage (Under-Sink Inline) | Independently tested to NSF/ANSI 42, 53, 401, 473; component 372. Broad reduction list with posted results. | High — shares reports + methods |
Legend: “Certified” = formally listed by NSF/IAPMO/WQA. “Independently tested” = third-party lab used NSF/ANSI methods but not formally listed. “Component compliance” = materials only (NSF/ANSI 61/372), not proof of contaminant reduction.
⚠️ Keep Note: Many products advertise “independent testing” without full NSF certification. Always check for published reports.
💸 Cost of Ownership

Buying the system is only half the equation — filter swaps and media replacements often cost more over time than the sticker price. We ran the math based on real replacement cycles and average household use (~2 gal/day for POU, ~50 gal/day for POE).
Product | Upfront Cost | Annual Filter Cost | Approx. Cost / Gallon |
---|---|---|---|
SpringWell CF1 | ~$928 | ~$40 (sediment prefilter swaps only) | ~$0.04/gal (media rated 1,000,000 gal.) |
Waterdrop G3P800 | ~$849 | ~$170 | ~$0.16–$0.23/gal |
AquaTru Classic | ~$449 | ~$100 | ~$0.20–$0.25/gal |
Clearly Filtered Pitcher | ~$90 | ~$230 (4–5 filters/yr @ ~$50 each) | ~$0.50/gal |
Clearly Filtered 3-Stage | ~$550 | ~$400 | ~$0.20/gal |
🧮 Helpful to Know: A $50 pitcher can end up costing more to run over 3 years than a $1,000 whole-house system. Long-life tank media almost always beats short-cycle cartridges.
🚰 Real-World Usability
Specs and certifications only tell part of the story. What matters in daily life is how hard a system is to install, how fast it pours, and how often you’ll be swapping filters. We tracked hands-on install times, measured actual flow rates with a stopwatch, and logged maintenance cycles to see which systems fade into the background — and which can become chores.
Product | Install Time | Flow Rate (Our Test) | Maintenance |
---|---|---|---|
SpringWell CF1 | 1–2 hrs (DIY kit or plumber) | 9–20 GPM (steady multi-tap use) | Prefilter 6–9 mo • Tank 10 yrs |
Waterdrop G3P800 | ~40 min | 1 gal in ~2 min (187 → 28 ppm TDS) | Cartridges 6–24 mo • Faucet tracks life |
AquaTru Classic | Plug & play | One clean tank ~15 minutes; gravity dispensing slows as the tank empties | Pre/Carbon 6 mo • RO/VOC 24 mo |
Clearly Filtered Pitcher | No install | 10 cups in 11m 52s | Filter ~100 gal (~4 mo) |
Clearly Filtered 3-Stage | ~15 min (wrench + tape) | 1 gal in 36s (pre) → 1:09 (post) | Cartridges yearly (~$400) |
💡 Pro Tip: A system’s lab score means little if it’s too slow or high-maintenance. Our stopwatch tests (gallons per minute) are one of the easiest ways to judge if you’ll actually enjoy using it day after day.
⚖️ Comparing System Trade-Offs
No two systems solve the same problem. A pitcher is perfect for renters who just want chlorine and bad taste gone, while a $1,000 whole-house filter protects every faucet and shower from chemicals day in, day out. Reverse osmosis brings the broadest contaminant protection but at the cost of slower output and higher upkeep.
The key is matching the tool to the job:
- Pitchers → quick, affordable, but limited to city water taste issues.
- Under-sink inline filters → simple installs with broader coverage, good middle ground.
- RO systems → best for households worried about PFAS, nitrates, or heavy metals.
- Whole-house carbon → best when you want to remove chlorine across the entire home without babysitting the system.
💡 Bottom Line: Most disappointments we hear from buyers come from picking the wrong type of filter for their water source. Start with your water test, then choose the category that actually solves the problem.
📝 Final Thoughts
Every filter in our lineup has its quirks — some sip electricity, some eat cartridges, some take forever to drip through. The winners aren’t “perfect,” they’re the ones that balance proof, price, and day-to-day sanity.
If there’s one lesson from all the testing, it’s this: buy the filter you’ll actually live with. The lab results matter, but so does not cursing at your sink every morning.
